Ana səhifə

Email questions answered by Karl Lentz on his mail list

Yüklə 365.18 Kb.
ölçüsü365.18 Kb.
  1   2   3   4
Lentz ism

Email questions answered by Karl Lentz on his mail list.

Do Not Print without looking first unless you want to use up ink.

73 pages with lots of color.

Karl’s color highlighting left as is. Edited minor typos and, removal of non pertinent info. Chronological as they appeared in my email. A few additions from transcripts or fans thrown in. Not exhaustive of Karl’s teachings but very instructive.

Some of the calls referenced are not available for public download but likely can be had for a donation to Karl.

Karl: NEVER, say anything in COURTROOMS, just say to the black robed one.... did U not get the documents i tendered to court 14 days ago? Put it All in Writing,,,,,never NOVATE..... google THAT word !!!


Q: I have a case in the federal court and was indicted. They assigned a pretender to the case and I stated that I did not want an attorney. I fought and fought. I also challenged the indictment and demand the charges be dismissed. They also sent me for several mental evaluations. At some point they sent me to Carswell in Texas for a mental evaluation for 30 days. I was released from Carswell and took a personal flight home. I finally got rid of the pretender and I submitted a Declinatory Plea and then the Judge made me get another attorney or he was going to send me back to the mental hospital. My last document was a libel of review. I have not heard nothing as of this point.


MY ANSWER, and it is Always my same ol' idiot lawful opinion,


for i not only do not speak legalese, NOR do i speak in: Chinese, Cantonese, Vietnamese...!
Karl says:

i am sure U have HEARD that at ANYTIME, u can demand to challenge JURISDICTION?
two simple things to say... are what?

i say it like a Broken record...

You do not speak at an arraignment. I ask for paper and pencil, judge can throw the book at you. So i don’t say anything to the man in the black robe. I don’t even recognize that he exists.

I write at the top


  1. Is there any man making a claim before this court?

  2. Is there a verified claim before this court?

  3. Can this claim be verified in this court at this time?

  4. Is there the [wo]man , here to verify it?

They have to answer you. They have to say yes there is a claim before the court.

That’s why you always move under the common law. They pick you up under code such and such how do you plead?
Plead to what? That drivel? I don’t even know what you just said. Well let me tell you what it means. No no no no no. i didn’t write that code i can’t be held... i didn’t write that contract. I don’t know what you’re reading. I don’t know how you’re interpreting. That’s not my words those are your words. Don’t tell me what they mean

99% of the time their answer will be...... NO!
So act in Honor and say.......

i will be more than glad to return to this court at anytime

once a [wo]man has appeared with a verified claim and

is willing to affirm it under oath
until then i move to dismiss this case WITHOUT prejudice, and will be more then glad to compensate the harmed party, once they make their presence and claim known to me.

"i, a man, James, do not believe i have done anything wrong. If there is any man here who claims i have done him wrong? If so, i require that he bring his claim and evidence of wrongdoing before me so that i can make restitution. If there is no man here who claims i have done wrong, i require that this matter be discharged."

people this is the same answer i have been saying and sending out for EVER...............

People, this is the TYPICAL CRAZY LETTER i get EVERYDAY by the HUNDREDS!!!

Q: I have been ordered to show cause why I failed to appear for an summons on DEC. 11TH. Can you help with that? I am attaching my response to the summons letters. This all goes back a few years when I was in Africa, they sent several certified letters. When I returned and responded, they said it was too late to contest their decision and denied my request for a hearing.
Karl: My cut-copy-paste ANSWER
Is there a man named IRS? (kind of Odd name) or is this a Mr. or a Miss, ms. or Mrs. IRS?

last name first? first name Last?
i think, now i maybe wrong, but i believe only a man has the right to say U have done him a wrong...
Hey, but what do i know?
Seriously ! Are U for real! Did U really do someone named IRS a wrong?
if U say U did this 'IRS' wrong, tell him or her Your sorry, tell them how can U make it up to them, and tell them U will try Ur best not to do it again...
For i have NO idea of any man, or woman i have known in my life Named in such a manner as irs, or Irs, or IRS or iRS, or any other spelling of the word,
for Only man can claim another man has done him a wrong,


if U want to BELIEVE, u can hurt something Other than [wo]man then g0dspeed to U sir with your [CRAZY] beliefs,
i can NOT help U, if U Do not KNOW how U Stand [status] in the Public venue, i suggest U stay at home....
Again i am using this MASS EMAIL to MASSIVELY explain that i do NOT , have the desire to explain something that Your parents shoulda TOLD You [like mine did] by the age of TWO!

Q: Do I need to find their public hazard bond and bond number? Do I need to find their malpractice insurance policy number listed with risk management or the general liability trust fund? I understand about the eye thing I can't see too well up close or far away. I can only focus from about 3 feet to 7 or 8 feet, all the rest of the time I'm having to change glasses all the time! Ha! Getting older is no should see my teeth or lac there of...

Karl: NO!

now this is JUST my BELIEF


i believe U canNOT make a CLAIM to a BOND UNTIL AFTER a Criminal CONVICTION,

DON'T do LIENS either UNLESS you do it THRU a District COURT,

NEVER by that Notary Process, non-sense !

again i BELIEVE, IT MUST BE FIRST PROVED, that they Broke Their BOND to you (another), before U place a claim to their BOND

but U may wish to seek advise from another,

BUT can U absolutely place a claim of a WRONG with them AND their indemnifiers, so YES go after their insurer/indemnifier ABSOLUTELY, and NO U don’t have to worry about The wrongdoers POLICY # AGAIN it is THEIR #, not YOURS !
Ooh their indemnifier is at times stylized as 'risk management' or 'General liability Trust Fund', U can find it thru their State's 'Finance Division' under the control of the Executive Branch of its Government


Q: ……..the county just had a sheriff’s sale on his property for building without a permit

Karl: all he had to do was pay for the improvements with say... a $20.oo Gold Coin (which is really worth $2,000),

that way for could have kept it under the "minimum" amount needed to spend before u have to report the improvement to the county, for a home improvement
Q; and how would one do that without applying for permits & site approvals that the county requires?
and the county refuses to accept gold & silver

Karl: tell me, what is the MINIMUM dollar amount or maximum , a person needs to spend ON A HOME IMPROVEMENT there in your county, BEFORE THEY HAVE TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT?

Q: I found a fee chart, it starts at $1-$500 is $24 fee it also states "PERMIT FEES Not adopted by the State of Oregon"
Karl: and also remember they, the County, ( tooo bad for them that there are no more COUNTS (u know like Royalty / a Prince), around who can swear under oath)

but the controllers of the County will ALWAYS (try to) claim they OWN the GROUND,

(which is NOT LAND!)
but just as in the UK,

the Crown Claims it owns the GROUND,

BUT the CROWN canNOT make a Claim to the Edifices/placed atop the Ground,

so to ME,

Whatever U do to the Building atop the Ground is NONE of ANYBODY else’s BUSINESS, UNLESS it is causing them harm (like a building so Tall it blocks the sunlight from touching another's home that was there BEFORE Your TALL building existed )


Q: Nov 28, 2012: where did you learn about the magic red box?
i know very few others that have that technology.
we learned about it from a navy captain.
it seems to create an irrevocable demand.

we are trying to find the historical legal/lawful origins of the method and why officials roll over to it...any ideas? did your judge pal let you in on it?

Karl: do U should enjoy how i stylized this court order , i didn’t allow angela to put this one up YET
and what do U feel the significance is between the colours say...





black borders?

i have my beliefs , but what are Yours?

Did You ever try to google the "8-corner rule" ?

in answer to your questions of color - I think the historical use has been

Red = Live Man
Dark Blue = Private/Live
Light Blue = Ecclesiastic
Purple = Royalty
Gold = Sovereignty
Black = Public/Dead

Karl: red is dead

blue is man viz., "blue bloods"...


Q: Why would Red be dead if it is the color of "life blood" and was used historically to press a blood thumbprint seal onto a contract to prove that it was the real man at the table?
We have read in their own codes that Black is both Dead and Commerce / Corporate...
What do you think?

Karl: Dont U Remember how Hannibal was stopped?

the Romans would pour blood on the ground and the elephants would not pass, knowing there was DEATH nearby
Blue is the color of man's blood, it turns RED once it spills out of man’s body and the oxygen turns it red'

RED is ALSO the way u write the word VOID across the face of a Document


Q: Thank you for the documents you sent me. I don't have the time (before the 3rd when my grandson comes up for adoption) to file a Federal law suit as you have done. The best I can do is to stop the adoption. I'm going to file some papers...that we do not consent and from that time forward we will be charging by the second or minute. I have already sent letters to that effect, but of course they've paid no attention to them. I'm basically trying to set them up for the Federal Law suit. If you look on Manta or Dun and Bradstreet, the court, the sheriff, the Department of Human Services etc. are all incorporated and thereby are a foreign jurisdiction everyone participating in the adoption or in court are committing treason. Of course they don't see it that way. I need to get their names and addresses before I get started with the court of record stuff and give them notice. Any tips you could give me as to the chronological order of how to proceed. As I told you I have studied Bill Thornton's method so I know and basically understand the Court of Record and how to get to it. After I establish the Court of Record do I kick everyone who is an agent out of the court?

Karl: find out who or where RISK MANAGMENT in whatever STATE Your kid/grandkid is in

it s ALSO stylized at times as a GENERAL LIABILTY TRUST FUND


CALL UP THE FINANCE DEPT. OF the State ask them to Whom or to Where do U need to file a claim , as in to tender a bill, when a State employee, harms U

when they say" what type of injury?" just say oooh, someone told me if it was a state employee HURT me, i could send a claim form into the States RISK Management or GLTF.......


THAT will get U a FAST hangup, with them saying YOU r CRAZY!

the TRICK is ALWAYS go after the POCKETBOOK!


Q: Do I need to find their public hazard bond and bond number? Do I need to find their malpractice insurance policy number listed with risk management or the general liability trust fund?

Karl: NO!

now this is JUST my BELIEF


i believe U canNOT make a CLAIM to a BOND UNTIL AFTER

a Criminal CONVICTION,

DON'T do LIENS either UNLESS you do it THRU a District COURt, NEVER by that Notary Process, non-sense !

again i BELIEVE, IT MUST BE FIRST PROVED, that they Broke Their BOND to you (another), before U place a claim to their BOND

but U may wish to seek advise from another,

BUT can U absolutely place a claim of a WRONG with them AND their indemnifiers, so YES go after their insurer/indemnifier ABSOLUTELY, and NO U don’t have to worry about The wrongdoers POLICY # AGAIN it is THEIR #, not YOURS !
Ooh their indemnifier is at times stylized as 'risk management' or 'General liability Trust Fund', U can find it thru their State's 'Finance Division' under the control of the Executive Branch of its Government

Q: What I wanted to do is exactly what you’re doing. File a claim in Federal court under the common law (bill Thornton's) approach. I have been told and read this also that you can make a complaint with Dun and Bradstreet against them, with proof of course, and if D&B gets three legitimate complaints the indemnifier is notified and they pull their bond. Without a bond they are out of a job. Whether that is true or not, I don't know. I want o file a claim in Federal court if I can get any justice there. Another place I could try that I have heard about is an international court of chancery. Have you heard of that? It is an equity court. One thing is for sure...these people have gone too far this time and I'm not stopping until they are all broke or in prison! Through the years I have been put in jail for trying to help a friend, arrested several times for shit that didn't cause anyone harm, had my house foreclosed on because I challenged the bank’s loan, had the IRS try to make claims when I wasn't even working, had many third party debt collectors come after me for their fake debts for cars, student loans, credit cards etc. Some of them I've beat in court and some of them have beat me, but stealing children is going over the top and I'm going to make them pay until they have nothing!

Karl: u have to come into Fed court with a federal question

but hell with all that

i have a simple question was the mom or dad criminally convicted


did they sign the kid away?

if they were criminally convicted, why won’t they give family the kids ( yes i know they make a fortune thru foster care, i mean what reason did they give U )


Why have U not just sued them in their local district court?

AND THIS Approach can be USED for EVERY WRONG, not just kids/CPS/DHR/ !!!!

for all State courts are common law courts, and all courts which hear matters OVER $20.oo are courts of record

so, i know my way is WAY toooo simple , as U have Mastered Years of Bullshit, but it as simple as filing a case stylized as simple as....

Someone is keeping U from YOUR property, which is being held in naked possession.
and again...

U first sent them a ' notice ' of the wrong ....

they ignored U or said "fu", ....

with THAT proof u went to any Bozo local district court where the wrongdoers reside ...


U filed a claim for the return of property..."correct?"
All that other stuff You wrote, well i don’t have 3 or 4 lifetimes to explain , that it is alllllll a total joke


Q: Mom signed them away, but my son wasn't involved with any of it, and they never notified him until he wrote them a couple of notices demanding the child back and of course instead of giving him back they gave him a hearing, saying it was at his request which it wasn't. He didn't go because he thought they would arrest him I went for him with power of attorney. He didn't do their drug test that they wanted him to take the time before. He also hasn't paid their child support that they told him to pay. Anyway, I have a couple of questions 1. at the point it is right now should I challenge their jurisdiction or should I try and take it into a court of record by saying announcing that I am one of the people making a claim in this court of record. I know about the jurisdiction thing and non of them have jurisdiction, but if it isn't challenged now I can't do it later, but I don't think I can do both. Also I don't have any time to file in federal court, the adoption hearing is Monday. If he is adopted can I overturn it in Fed Dis Court? If I do the court of record thing will they even understand what I am doing?

wow, people are THICK, ;), ok i am going to save U people tens-of thousands of dollars in legal fees, ok ready? and for granny or others who SIGNED the kids over to the STATE "skip" down to the GREEN SECTION

again if u listened to the 2 shows i did

file a simple 3 page suit in the closest district county/state court near the child

a coversheet it can be as simple as

page one

first thing U write top middle of cover sheet

i,verify all herein be true:

yes the 'i' is in lowercase,

i aint got the time to explain again about full reservation of rights nor of the BEHEADING of the 'i' INTO an 'I', where there are just two arms and legs sticking out...(capitus maximus, media, minumus )

the name of the courthouse

  • Your name

  • v.

  • their name

  • Cause Of Action: the Adminisration of Property w/o right

page #2

  1. i ____ ____ gave no entity the right to administrate my property;

  2. i say that _____ is my property;

  3. i say no [wo]man will make a claim, saying my claim is untrue,

  4. i want my property returned to me, and;

  5. said property is to be totally under my control , posthaste;

  6. i will charge the wrongful holder $_____ for each second said property is not returned starting on the 22 day after they have recived their summons/notice to answer my suit/claim, attached to this suit

Page # 3

i verify now and will affirm, in open court that all inhere be true...

  1. the date________

  2. write your name___

  3. sign______

  4. right thumb print in BLUE ink lower right hand corner

even simpler is just say u WISH, the child to be returned posthaste!!!

U people must think i am JOKING !!!

U say , oooooh come on Karl, GET REAL,,,,

ooh , okay Alll of YOU Doubting Thomas' here it is found within THEIR CODE....
Code of Alabama Title




§ 04

(2)Authority to place

(b) The Department has no authority under a voluntary agreement to hold a child against the parent's wishes; consequently, the parent has the right at any time to request and to receive his child. Voluntary agreements are to be accepted only in situations in which the Department would have no hesitancy in returning the child to his parents.


Q: : ……..attached is a friend that is having a federal criminal charge for marijuana dispensing, ...

He never challenged the jurisdiction of the charge the District Attorney brought up.... he did submit his declaration of affidavit status of being a free man..... he is due for a jury selection and ready to proceed the case on ……………

........I think my next best course of action is to file a Counter Claim challenging jurisdiction as it is very clear to me now that jurisdiction CAN be legally challenged and they (USA) will have no other choice but to drop their frivolous criminal suit against me. I am feeling also that in the Counter Claim that a charge against human rights violations (attack by US Marshalls) should be also asserted. I would ask for everyone at this point to review the material and see if you can find anything in this material that might not apply. With that said, I will begin my preparation of my Counter Claim using the challenge to jurisdiction as the main force of it. For the Judge to blatantly deny me my challenge during a conference call the other day was downright fraud and deceitful on his part. ……….


  1. u NEVER reduced Your status from a man aggrieved to that of a Plaintiff ! (Coca-Cola, can be a Plaintiff, but it could Never be a man aggrieved)\\\

  2. "They can not Violate Your rights, they can ONLY interfere with them.

  3. The STATE has no duty to protect any PART of your person, including Your rights, That is YOUR JOB!

  4. Ooh and U NEVER Plea, plea = beg, a man NEVER BEGS

UNTIL Youse learn the differences, Ooh well....

Q: i have been holding this letter until i got the nerve to ask you if it was your intention to
that I offer to pay only half of the amount they say I owe or it was a math mistake.

THIS IS MY ANSWER TO HER AND EVRYBODY, IN A SIMILAR SITUATION, that i too have used in my checkered Past dealings with the courts...
if they (Gov't) say U owe a debt, in this country, U can simply say...
"by my word, i can only pay You, $ ____ .__ a month,

for any more demand of my person

will cause me harm,

and i know this honorable court does not want to cause harm to a [wo]man, before it...
Yes , folks law i just this simple..........


Q: I will suggest that I pay one us dollar a month on all my debts. mortgage, car, credit cards, and utilities

Karl: my answer to Doubting Tomas...

yes that will absolutely Work,

(just like that 'AFV' non-sense does work)

BUT BUT BUT just remember it will destroy Your credit rating (if U even have one), and if U want a cellphone in the future, or to have Your Electricity turned on at a new location, "They" Will DEMAND a Huge Up-front CA$H deposit
Always remember, yes U can do whatever U WISH, but it Always comes with a Price $$$

So just be prepared to pay the price for Your wishes ( as in with cash from then on...)


Q; I am being wronged by a township collecting taxes and they cannot use
federal reserve notes to collect them per the fed reserve act of 1913 section 16 which says that FRNs are to be used between banks and for no other purposes. If I can't use this in Fed Dist court a jury would convict me for sure. I don't know what else I can say for the reason

I don't believe the Township Inc cannot administer my property without my consent.


all claims MUST BE VERIFIED, in open court;

but , but BUT, ( always the Big BUT)

if u forget to wish and demand it, they don’t and they WONT


a jury over TAXES? NO WAY !!!
i would just have one-man in a black robe,

ORDER the other-side to bring the verified claim before the court!
IN cases where it is U against a fiction-inlaw

You Stay in the status of [wo]man,

do NOT let them refer to U as the defendant,

(defendant against a fiction...., yes it is like saying... my toaster is attacking me)
AND, i would say to the other-side prior to trial,

1. "is it your wish to continue to move a court w/o a verified claim and claimant?"

(for only [wo]man can wish, a fiction cannot)
2. Say... to the wish maker..."then i am going to also make a case, against you, i will have the Clerk of case, enter my claim" (so i can get my own case #) against U for making an claim that is not verifiable, and i will order compensation of $___ for wasting my with Your frivolous unverifiable claim"

this is ANGELA's link to her Past shows, i was on tonight, after about one and a half hours, some man named SHANE was on before me, just try to understand what i am saying o avoid alllllll that stufffff U are reading, it is wayyyyy too much overkill, for such an easy problem. i think i was on for 2-3 hours on her Episode 187; 188; and 191 (about an 1 1/2 hours into the show for about an hour...........


Q: The local town is coming after me with code enforcement and the troopers. I need to hold them off until I have time to study, but in state court I'm just getting trashed. If you have time to talk with me I can go into detail.

Karl: IF u listened to what i said on ANG's show, it was this simple ...

what did i say U say to the magistrate?

( Remember , even a Notary is a Magistrate)

where is the verified claim?

who is here to verify this claim?

(U dont have to say this but REMEMBER

who[m] is [T]here to verify this... warrant / writ / order/ summons/ lien/ treaty/ debt/.....)
if it is not VERIFIED it does not assume/carry full liability of the [wo]man who penned it

AND if YOU, want to believe that PIECE OF PAPER has POWER OVER YOU,


oh well ,

who am i to,


Q: Karl, I have been in a civil matter for over 2yrs, fired my attorney about 5 months ago. I filed a 12 b 1-6 Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist until these challenges were answered.

Karl: Did you just say "I filed a 12 b 1-6"
Did U just Admit that U "TOOK" [one of ] THEIR CODES !,

and try to pass it off as an ANSWER, of YOUR "Own" (as in ownership)?!

that is just outright stealing, that takes SPUNK!

be GLAD the Court did NOT take NOTICE of Your Crazy ACT...



Bonds are Mostly for executors of wills...

executor is simply the man or woman the dead person lives in charge

to make sure the dead man’s wishes are performed



Wow did U hear me the first times i was on ANGELAS show in OCT?
i think VERY highly of Mr. Carl Miller

BUT i had to TRASH his stuff; he TRIES to explain something called a Constitution,

if U actually, understood the bill of rights Ninth Amendment, all other documents are meaningless,

Ninth Amendment

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people

i exercise those retained as one of the people- agents of fictions cannot deny me

Again simpler, he and everyone else who uses Codes or Cites, are using someone else's Property

you can compare Your beliefs to others, BUT u cannot use them word-for-word, yes it is theft.

Q: is the following maxim the reason you use the word wrong and wrongdoer in your court papers?

A common law court is a law court not an equity court. Why does the word wrong help you in a court of record if it is a maxim of equity?

first maxim of equity...

Equity will suffer no wrong without a remedy.. so tell them.. I demand a change in jurisdiction to equity... I have been wronged and demand remedy..

only a man can do what is right or wrong,

and only man [jury] can judge what is right or wrong

the ACTOR ,in the black robe is in the capacity of an ACTOR/fiction, IT, can ONLY move/judge, in accordance of a WRITTEN CODE [term of art]
right and wrong is NOT jurisdictional specific

it is known as a term found amongst those of the common parlance

again if it is WRITTEN DOWN, it is a CODE

if it is KNOWN to those who canNOT even read nor write, it is a common law
Q: I'm listening to Angela's call, my home in Florida was foreclosed on unlawfully in Oct. 2011, and I'm now in Alabama. I need help, but the one thing my husband and I contended in court that we are man and woman, and not the legal fiction or the described Defendants; also they never allow us to have a trial by jury nor did the Plaintiff ever come to court to convene the court, nor did they allow any discovery, interrogatories, etc...then they trespassed our property with a swat team of sheriffs for one week resurveyed our property, and then took our house claim the property description was in-correct and then split off my house and foreclosed on it under a different parcel no but the same 911 address... you can reach me at xxxxxxxxxxx; Then they opened another case and placed an injunction on us, even though we refused to participate, never went to their court on the 2nd case in Florida; stating we could not go on the remaining of our property (2 acres) which has no lien on it, nor are we allowed to contact the bank or assigns or new owner of our property or to obtain our bank records, and then they sold my home while I was in appeals court and denied our injunction request....just one big fat mess!!

I just don't understand how they did what they did to won't either once you hear my complete story...


biggest problem for U is U do not know the difference between an

Administrative Court

and a

court of law

95% of the courts in the US, move Administratively on Average everyday
just like any society, man EVER built,

those in charge kept U happy, DURING THE CONSTRUCTION

now that it is all built ,

they don’t need YOU,

and they are taking everything that made U happy

[dumb and in Your place] away from U ,

so U either starve or;

kill yourselves, or ;

be grateful for the crumbs they toss to YOUSE
SEE it is just youse, Have been so happy Your whole lives being their subjects, and now that, Your Masters, are taking their property back,

U seem to believe it is not within their power? [control, jurisdiction]
the Only good thing that happened to U folks, is when U realize U been in a gilded cage, and U see how it was done to youse, U will actually windup happier, as it will make U realize just where You and Your true standing IS upon the land...
funny example, say that BEFORE someone wants to be elected the PRESlDENT OF THE U.S.,

she or he TOSSED gold coins all OVER the country, by airplanes,

so then U go VOTE for this WONDERFUL, person, to represent [well, to be] , YOU,
BUT after he or She, gets into OFFICE

they slooooowly tax all of the GOLD ,

they sprinkled onto to YOU,

back into THEIR pockets,

YES it is a SICK game

BUT , yes You fall for it everyyyyy time

and they know, and You can’t help Yourselves.
Q: When are you going back on Angela’s show to talk about the IRS? Also you mention putting exempt on the W4, what happens when the IRS challenges it or the Job?

NO ONE likes when i talk about the IRS,

it helped me, learn my status, standing, and jurisdiction

of i as a man,

And between me and my obligations:

to the State,

to man and;

to g0d
Q: Bench or Jury Trial you told me that no way would a jury be in my favor for property taxes.
So then what would you suggest if there is only a jury of men and women in common law court of record?

Nothing? Am I toast?


No, U can have a BENCH Trial in a court of record,

that way the black robed one, can ONLY hear what is Written in THEIR books,'

so U make the Fiction bring the Written word into the court, [see it is so simple]

listen careful to all four of the shows i did

i explained for HOURS

WHY sometimes NEVER go before a Jury {like for traffic tix, and taxes}

because these MORON jurors FEEEEEEEEEEEL [ not law, but Feeeeeeeeeel ]

Q: Definition of POWER then & now . A: possession of control, authority, or influence over others??

Karl: this is the way the bill of rights of the US Constitution Article X, uses the term power


Q: What makes the IRS a perfect organization?

Karl: it helps U to actually learn and be concerned with studying law

if there was no IRS, troubling Your Mind, U would be off doing something FUN, fun , fun

instead of learning what "it" is and what "u" are in relation to "everything else around you"
people neeed the IRS, if for nothing else, but to help them to Stop and THINK,

if we had no one[thing] SLOWING "Us" down, 99% of "us", would be going Hog Wild!
U know i say it is true, because 99% of mankind no longer (if EVER) truly has a concern for his fellow man,
heck most people do not even know who their neighbors are anymore!
so yes, if a man was giving BACK to society (does the word, "donations" ring a bell?)

there would be no need for a CODE to HELP [wo]man to find their wallets!
and i don’t care WHERE the money actually goes , (its all just zeros and ones, and/or silly green paper)

for all i care they can BURN it

as long as it helps keep 'man' under a little bit of control, that is fine with me


Q: I am thinking about writing back to the lawyer with this -"Do you have a "verified" claim against me?" Who{m} is the {wo}man to verify, under oath, this "alleged" debt?

Should I add - If you do not have a "verified" claim against me, then quit harassing me, or I will file a claim against you in a common law court of record, and prosecute you in a trial by jury!


You people need to calm down and do ONE step at a time
that is to say, each step is a SEPARATE LETTER, thru USPS (snail) mail, NOT EMAILs

letter #1. i wish to have a copy of the claim of a debt or (debt claim , or just ...debt) and its corresponding statement
letter #2. is this the claim of debt that was verified in open court
letter #3. was this claim of debt determined by way of a summary judgment

and it may be stylized as

who(m) .... (wo)man

who[m] .... [wo]man
NOT in any form of English have it seen it stylized as

Who{m} is the {wo}man

but hey what do i know ;)


Q: You've Been Declared Legally DEAD - Here's How To Correct The Record


U can Not be DECLARED Legal Anything, it is an Oxymoron


to DECLARE the declarer MUST be of living breathing flesh and blood

THAT WAY the declaration can be sworn to or affirm [viva voce] in open court!

LEGAL, is a DEAD instrument, written word; two dimensional
Q: Question i received?

letter #1. i wish to have a copy of the claim of a debt

I did send a letter to the Alaska attorney requesting validation of "alleged" debt, and the attorney sent a copy of the "judgment" from the Colorado court, along with the clerks copy and certification of copy of the "judgment". He also sent a copy of the notice of filing a foreign judgment in the Alaska court. Maybe I am not understanding the term "claim of debt"! Is not the filing of a lawsuit by the Colorado attorney against me, a "claim of debt"?

letter #1. i wish to have a copy of the claim of a debt

a claim of a debt is as simple as when U go to Wafflehouse, and

the waitress brings U out the bill of what u owe, for what U ate

YOU ask who is ever claiming U owe them something, if U can please see the bill, ? still don’t know what i said, ? What if the waitress at Wafflehouse says U owe a million dollars? are U not going to ask her to see the bill?; to make sure she doesn’t have U mistaken with the man ,next to U who order a million waffles and U just ordered two....

okay, so U do THAT step first, send it thru the USPS , NOT via telephone nor EMAIL,

U CAN send it via FAX, BUT ALWAYS follow it up with a HARD COPY
remember U ALWAYS keep the Original , They always get a copy

and write COPY, DIAGONALLY Across the face (embed it)

Q: I've heard you twice now say that when pops up, the first sentence says "All federal courts are Article III courts under the Constitution." But I couldn't find that.

When I clicked the "Federal Courts" link at the top I found the following...

"Our Founding Fathers understood the need for an independent Judiciary, which was created under Article III of the United States Constitution. The Judicial Branch is one of the three separate and distinct branches of the federal government. The other two are the legislative and executive branches."
Sorta like a history lesson. A Walmart employee telling us what our forefathers intended.

What am I missing?
no , u found the correct Link,

but you just STOP reading at the FIRST "thing"

that "kinda" sounds like what i said?


you should read it all

so you will be competent

when the clerk says...

"the USDC, is the SAME as a federal court"

we can ask them if they are now acting in the capacity of a federal court, which then bounds them to the Constitution

Q: I am part of a group here in Wisconsin that would very much like to be in contact with you. We are hoping to approach the Marshals in a similar way as we use common law in our court cases. I would also like to see more of your paperwork -- I did check Angela's site and collected what is there... but I think you have more like you said. I would also like to have one of our group speak with you, if you are willing........

i did it the old fashioned way

You can just walk in and Ask the U S Marshals their opinions


You can ask for an appointment for when you can sit down and talk to an Agent or their legal dept
to 'me', the whole TRICK, is when U enter the Public (the commons)

make them aware of WHY, you are intercoursing with others

You can be a total Sh*t,

and just BELIEVE, that

you are sovereign AND

Ooh thanks for reminding me about the US Marshals

i FORGOT to write a Nice Letter , to their Supervisors

i will get my Sister, right on it, she is GREAT at being Polite,

Ooh i will Add a few nice comments

BUT overall, well, i am, Cr(ass)
Q: I did not find the example of the claim you spoke about on Angela's show.

well Mr. Wright,

no you are not blind !

BUT it took me YEARS to write it

so before i do anything that may cause me harm

i have to ask ...


what ?


why ?

the person seeking it needs it?
Q; I am listening to ALL your calls on angela's talkshoe --and taking notes. So, now I have the answers to some of my questions.
I am going to use "return my property" for my friend to get her hubby out of jail.

which call of Gordon can I find you on his call.

yes, if he is married let his wife file a claim for the return of her property (husband)

a Black-robed one (unless U consent to him "adjudicating") cannot deny/dismiss/discharge a '[wo]man's CLAIM
Gordon Hall curses at me like a Drunk Sailor on His Show 10/22/2012 09:00 PM EDT / 59:06 / EPISODE93 - Contracts In Motion
Q: Karl, do you know the case that says...Statutes, codes, regulations, etc are not Law or that they are not binding? What ever?


west virginia board of education v. Barnett (1943)
BUT Honestly if U EVER listened to me

U Do NOT Use their opinions...

if U do, U will just have to learn the Hard Way

and It is a Waste of time

Not only mine, but YOURS, to know these "cases"

as in... Your (nor, i) am EVER going to BEAT them

at Their own GAME
So when Youse "ask" me questions like this,

i know Your not understanding what i am saying

on the Internet Talkshows/ Talkshoes /Podcasts


I don't how you have me on your mailing list , but please remove me. Thanks

Editor Note: See Karl’s answer in the context of an agent or officer asking/implying order for you to perform…………….

The following is VERY instructive for a proper mindset


Answer AND Counter offer:


You don't know how you have me on your mailing list ???

you sent me A REQUEST!

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Greg <> wrote:

So i believe, that YOU approached me with YOUR wish to intercourse in correspondence;
i give all fair-warning,

that when i, respond

to emails, that are sent ONLY to

that i, send it out Questions AND Answers, to all others,

i, do so (in such a manner, so

i, don’t have to ANSWER the SAME Questions

hundreds of times;
i, by way of best effort,, redact everyone's names

(including to, but not limited to the use of BCC)

so others can’t see it

i, do NOT have to,

BUT i, do by way of best effort, to

So please do not just wish (ask) (place a burden of me) (a charge) to waste my:

time; life; energy, and/or ; money to perform more of Your (frivolous) wishes (modification of a Mass Email List)
Simply put,

You are a [wo]man,

and when you make a wish,

You bear full liability, whenever, however, wherever,

for all of Your [in]actions, of your wish(es)

including to, but not limited to,

when U wish to intercourse (contract)(sex) with others of [wo]mankind
Counter offer:

Do u wish to compensate me for my time and effort to NOW do something ELSE for U?

What do U believe would be 'fair and just' compensation, for me to PERFORM for Your pleasure (benefit), YET AGAIN?

Do U believe i am not to be compensated when another: asks; wishes, or orders me about ?


Do you believe i am Yours or any other of [wo]mankind's, b***ch ?

; )

thanks, hope to hear a counter-offer, to comeforth from u , soon

(it helps others on this MASS EMAIL LIST about, common law procedure)...



anything with a psych evaluation you have to explain to them “i don’t see any paperwork being generated by a man. Who is going to generate this paperwork? Look, i will carry out any order that any man orders me to do because i am going to hand you a bill for compensation and you’re not going to like the dollar amount on it, but i will do whatever you order me to do, and you will pay me, won’t you? Or am i your slave?


Thanks for the summons, My property has been file with acknowledgment of deed and claiming the land patent. It was filed last year I still cannot get it off of the tax rolls. Got any ideas?

did U listen to Angela's "My private audio" call on Jan 28th, 2013?

i told 2 men, who were going around-and-around with me, about TRYING to Beat them at their Own Games and 'terms of art'
"i believe" that if U folks KEEP on INSISTING, playing UNDER their Rules and their Silly words like...Deed... Land Patents...U are at "THEIR" mercy on how they choose (flip a coin/Equity) to Rule on Your Claim, So if YOU LOVE living UNDER a RULER, U folks just go right AHEAD!

Q: I have listened to you speak on Angela's call. Almost 2 weeks ago you came on and spoke on W4s. I need more clarification. I am starting a new job and next Monday I have to go in and fill out the paperwork. Let me say it is a private employer with a government contract. I have always been told that if you are paid by the government you are subject to the income tax. Also if you claim US citizenship, you are liable for it. I cannot afford to lose this job over the way I fill out the paperwork.

I would appreciate if you would speak to these issues and go over how the W4 should be filled out with regard to the non assumpsit. This employer does not issue paychecks. They can only do automatic deposits into checking or savings accounts or put the money on a "payment card". My past jobs I had paper checks and claimed lawful money (per 12USC411), however I will not be able to do that without a paper check.
You also mentioned that I need to keep the original and give them the copy, how do you explain that? Are there laws or codes to show them? I know you don't like using codes, so I don't know how to rebut anything they may say when I attempt this.


fill out 2 OF THEM

keep one in your possession

give the other on to them

(a W-4, is basically a GIFT , FROM U )

you ask..."Are there laws or codes to show them?"

The law comes by way of:

the customs of your people;

your shows-and-actions (deeds),


are made verifiable, viva-voce
So written CODES againnnnnnn, are made by whom?

YES by Attorneys ,

who WRITE them for a [wo]man to Submit to being THEIR (Attorneys) governed ones
So if u wish them to be your RULERS, kneel down and OBEY to their RULES, and continue to Appear, Enter, PLEAD, MOTION, PETITION, PRAY FOR RELIEF from THEM, or learn how to:




demand for your property/rights while we still can

I do not think any process for forcing a common-law court or how to get them to use the small case title for the court. Thanks,

I have been trying to learn true law and follow Rod Class some. I recently heard a recording of a call you made to a show on my private audio; I would like to have a copy of your one page claim. Also I could not understand the procedure used to force a common law court. I think I heard you say the name of the paper to file but do not know the spelling. Any other advice on how to make that happen and stay that way would be appreciated. I understand the prosecutor may not move in the court and the case would default. I guess they might stop it before they seat jury. Anyway, thanks a lot for teaching how this all should work.



ROD CLASS: he may be a WONDERFUL Ideas on HOW to RESTORE the REPUBLIC when it "Collapses"

i , Karl Lentz, want NO PART of ANY restructuring of Any Govt OUTSIDE of my Domestic Authority

(what Day does Rod class , do His Show? , i will call him up and give him a Good Ol' run-around, on his Beliefs)

the Prosecutor / Plaintiff / harmed party

Has to be PHYSICALLY Standing and Ready to Testify in Open-court,

if he is NOT present , his/her Case cannot Move
An Attorney for the GOVT is NOT the Prosecutor / Plaintiff / harmed party !
Editor Note: the attorney can only argue about facts on the record. Attorney cannot put facts on record for another man. No testimony = No Facts = No Case
Q: You made a short blurb about viva voce in open court? If I understood you correctly, you seemed to say that any judgment where there was no "live voice" testimony in open court was void on its face? Did I understand correctly, and , if so, are there cites that confirm that supposition? Thanks, hope to hear back from you on this fairly quickly.

Karl: trinsey v. pagliaro (1964)


Richard Cornforth , Oklahoma

His Second Video...
Q; Please tell me or which talkshoe do you discuss in more detail, how do you handle the "Name" thing, when the Judge in Justice (traffic) court says the name that is listed on their paperwork? How do you move from that opening to a common law court?
Also how do i get rid of a public defender from re-presenting me?
  1   2   3   4

Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur © 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət